Hi! I've two small feature requests: Add two overloads: Now we have
Those overloads will be useful in reflection scenarii, where it is not possible to define type in code but a type object is available
Be compatible with Structure IE be able to call :
Regards, This thread was imported from our support forum. The original discussion may contain more detailed answer. |
Hello olorin, the first one is already done: use Entity[string fieldName] indexer for getting and setting values. As for the second one, we decided not to support such kind of syntax as it lead to possible business logic violation (I mean setting structure field value without even instantiating of structure instance which might contain arbitrary logic & behavior, etc.). |