It seems not to be possible to build without installing DO anymore. I need this on build server, and that would be practical for the rest of the team.

Scenario: I have all the binaries necessary to build (basically Bin, Common, Lib folders of Program Files) in a folder in source control.

I have a Property in my .csproj like this : <dataobjectsdotnetpath>$(MSBuildProjectDirectory)..\ExternalLibs\DataObjects.Net</dataobjectsdotnetpath>

I added the following targets : <import project="$(MSBuildToolsPath)\\Microsoft.CSharp.targets"/> <import project="$(DataObjectsDotNetPath)\\Common\\DataObjects.Net.targets"/> <import project="$(DataObjectsDotNetPath)\\Common\\Defaults.MixedProject.targets"/>

This was working with DO 4.3 RC1, but now I get :

POSTSHARP : postsharp error PS0099: Unhandled exception (2.0.5.1207, 32 bit, CLR 4.0, Release): System.InvalidOperationException: DataObjects.Net is not installed. Please install it or run Install\Install.bat. 
POSTSHARP : postsharp error PS0099:    at Xtensive.Core.Weaver.PlugIn.Initialize() 
POSTSHARP : postsharp error PS0099:    at PostSharp.Extensibility.Task.^pFnf8wEt(TaskTypeConfiguration _0, XmlElement _1, Project _2) 
POSTSHARP : postsharp error PS0099:    at PostSharp.Extensibility.Configuration.TaskTypeConfiguration.^N565HL29(XmlElement _0, Project _1) 
POSTSHARP : postsharp error PS0099:    at PostSharp.Extensibility.TaskCollection.Add(String taskTypeName) 
POSTSHARP : postsharp error PS0099:    at PostSharp.Extensibility.Tasks.AutoDetectTask.Execute() 
POSTSHARP : postsharp error PS0099:    at PostSharp.Extensibility.Project.ExecutePhase(String phase) 
POSTSHARP : postsharp error PS0099:    at PostSharp.Extensibility.Project.Execute() 
POSTSHARP : postsharp error PS0099:    at PostSharp.Hosting.PostSharpObject.ExecuteProjects() 
POSTSHARP : postsharp error PS0099:    at PostSharp.Hosting.PostSharpObject.InvokeProject(ProjectInvocation projectInvocation)

Neither Postsharp or DataObjects are installed on build server.

Is it a new limitation?

Updated at 26.05.2010 7:49:20

Ok, I'll define it : thanks for your answer.

This thread was imported from our support forum. The original discussion may contain more detailed answer.