Question

Hi,

When a CollectionChanged with action Remove is fired, the Entity has IsRemove = true. Any access to the object cause the 'Entity is removed' Exception. We think that this is a bit too strict. When we get the object from DO we sometimes need the info in the object do determine which object we have to delete in our own list. We can however not reach this information because of the mentioned exception. Would it be possible to allow read-only access to the object?

Regards Paul Sinnema Diartis AG

Answer 1

0

I'm thinking about adding something like this:

var sessionConfiguration = ...;
sessionConfiguration.Options |= SessionOptions.AccessRemovedObjects;
using (var session = domain.OpenSession(sessionConfiguration)) {
  var person = ...; 
  person.Remove();
  Console.WriteLine("Person name: {0}", person.Name);
}

Will this be enough to solve the problem?

answered Nov 23 '10 at 03:13

Alex Yakunin
2971●4●4●12

Hi Alex,

We don't need and would even want to prevent write access to removed objects. So the getters are ok but the setters are forbidden.

Regards
Paul

(Nov 23 '10 at 03:20) Paul Sinnema

Yep, that's exactly what this implies. Can't modify, but can read. So likely the flag must be renamed.

(Nov 23 '10 at 03:33) Alex Yakunin

Is this going to be in 3.4.4?

(Nov 24 '10 at 14:10) Paul Sinnema

Created & implemented: issue 855.

(Nov 26 '10 at 11:21) Alex Yakunin

Hi Alex,

Can we download this somewhere?

Regards Paul

(Dec 03 '10 at 03:30) Paul Sinnema

Not yet - installers will be updated on the end of this week (most likely, @ Saturday or Sunday).

(Dec 03 '10 at 04:16) Alex Yakunin

Subscription:

Related questions